Sir Trolled's Operater Application REDUX

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Sir Trolled's Operater Application REDUX

Post by Sir Trolled on Sun Apr 27, 2014 5:28 pm

Steam Name: [VG] Ergo Magnum Trolled

Steam Profile Link: http://steamcommunity.com/id/sirtrolledoftrollington

Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:56465069


1. How old are you? 18



2. How long have you been playing on the server? A little over a month.



3. Why do you want to be a staff member? I feel that, while I may have been a nuisance at several times, I have contemplated my actions and have fully understood the differences between what is right and wrong. With this improvement, I want to try another hand at the job.



4. What factions are you currently whitelisted for? The Metropolice Force, Vortigaunts, and Antlions.



5. How well known are you on the server? I think most of the playerbase knows who I am.



6. Do other players on the server like you? Essentially, yes.



7. Have you ever been banned? No.



8. Have you ever been kicked? No.



9. Have you ever been warned? My God, many times.



10. Why should we choose you as an operator? I have fully realized that the powers and responsibilites that come with this staff position are important and must be treated as such. With this, I believe that I can make a useful addition to the staff.



11. Have you helped anyone on the server yet? Yes.



12. Have you ever helped someone on the server? Give an example if so. When I was still an operator, I have assisted many in ways such as teaching newer players the ropes and basics of SeriousRP, kicking minges, stopping mingery, etc.



13. Why are you more mature than other players? I try my best to keep my cool OOC, and not joke around half of the time I'm online. Usually, I succeed.



14. Are any of your characters important? I believe that Joseph Kralie is rather important.



15. Are you active on the server? Indeed.



16. Will you be able to be active a lot? Yes.



17. What do you do in this situation:

Two players are arguing in OOC, one is angry because the other stole his ration before he could get a chance to pick it up. You have no clue where the players are at the moment. I'd teleport both players to a secluded location devoid of IC access or roleplay. Then, I'd ask them if it was taken with or without roleplay. If it was powergamed or taken without roleplay, I'd then issue a kick to the mingegrabber, but not before commanding him to drop the ration item. Finally, I'd TP the user back to his previous location.


18. What do you do in this situation:

A citizen is mingepunching a civil protection officer, he isn't listening to what they explain to him in LOOC, and he continues. I would physgun him away from the user, to a secluded location. I would then state that it is against the rules to use the fists offensively without roleplay in any situation. If he would continue, I would issue a kick and a ban if he continues afterwards.



19. A citizen sneaks up on a unit while they were preoccupied, and hit the unit on the head with some sort of object. The unit is upset because the citizen did not roll. Who is right, and why? The citizen is correct because, although officers can recieve augmentations at certain high ranks, they are not ninjas, and cannot sense another person sneaking up behind them. (Unless they RP'd making some noise, breathing heavily, etc.) Also, the server roleplay is play-to-lose by default, ergo rolling is not a requirement and not a viable reason to halt roleplay or take any action regarding administrative assistance.



20. A group of citizen attacks an overwatch unit with no weapons whatsoever. The overwatch unit overpowers them and amputates all of them on the spot. The citizens are upset that they didn't have a chance to win, or that the overwatch unit didn't play to loose. Who is in the right and why? "The Overwatch unit is in the right, due to the fact that they are clad in layers of thick armor, and are augmented to be stronger and faster than any citizen. However, the citizens could theoretically be correct, if there were many of them and, and if they were using extremely heavy attacks that were potentially fatal to the Overwatch unit, then the citizens would be in the right. It would all depend on the circumstances of their location, but usually, the Overwatch unit would be correct.



21. A citizen climbs into the City Administrator's mail cute with the help of another citizen. They're both a bit bored, and feel like messing around. What do you do? I tell them both to get in-character and TP them outside. If they were to do it again, I would kick them both, then ban them if they continued.




22. What can you offer to our community? I can offer assistance to those who require it.



23. Do you tend to mess around a lot in LOOC chat? This includes but is not limited to the following:
"XD" "LELELELEL" "LOLVOID" "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO" No, although I do make some jokes or humorous replies on occasions.


24. Do you tend to do crazy things, and then void them right after? No.



25. Do you get upset if you do not get your way? That is the behavior of a three-year old. No.



26. Will you get angry if you do something wrong, and a higher staff member corrects you? I would get slightly frustrated at myself, but not at the staff member.



27. Why do you like the server? Why is it unique to you? I don't just like this server. I /love/ this server. It is different from any other I've ever played on. The canon, the roleplay, the beta aspect, the friendly players and staff, they are all facets that do not appear in many other servers and communities today.


**Also, I'd like to say some things to the staff and Sheeplie in particular. I've been a nuisance, yes, but I've reviewed my actions and have learned from them. I have changed. I can assure you.


Last edited by Sir Trolled on Thu May 01, 2014 6:37 pm; edited 2 times in total
avatar
Sir Trolled
Member

Posts : 11
Join date : 2014-03-22
Age : 21
Location : your closet

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Sir Trolled's Operater Application REDUX

Post by Kookie on Mon Apr 28, 2014 9:10 pm

8/10. It's good, but there are some things that could be improved. For example, question 19 is ok, but your reasoning isn't what the application reviewers are looking for. The answer would probably be, "The Citizen; If he didn't agree to roll, they don't have to roll." The server is P2L, unless agreed on by both (or all, if theres more than two) parties. Otherwise, pretty good app. There are some other mistakes, I can point them out if you want to.
avatar
Kookie
Active Member

Posts : 100
Join date : 2014-03-22
Location : in ur mom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Sir Trolled's Operater Application REDUX

Post by Sir Trolled on Tue Apr 29, 2014 2:01 am

Kookie wrote:8/10. It's good, but there are some things that could be improved. For example, question 19 is ok, but your reasoning isn't what the application reviewers are looking for. The answer would probably be, "The Citizen; If he didn't agree to roll, they don't have to roll." The server is P2L, unless agreed on by both (or all, if theres more than two) parties. Otherwise, pretty good app. There are some other mistakes, I can point them out if you want to.

Please do. Any constructive criticism is greatly appreciated.
avatar
Sir Trolled
Member

Posts : 11
Join date : 2014-03-22
Age : 21
Location : your closet

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Sir Trolled's Operater Application REDUX

Post by Kookie on Tue Apr 29, 2014 4:25 pm

Well, for one, you left 22 blank. I think you skipped over it to answer it later and forgot to come back to it. Other than that, if you could maybe add a small section (or write in the comments) about how/why you've changed and you think you deserve a second chance at Operator. However, there's one thing that I'd like to point out to anyone reviewing this application. He was honest. He said "I usually keep my cool". He wasn't like the other applicants who are usually like, "I have literally never said a sentence of hatefulness to another player." If I was reviewing this application, that'd give it a pretty big boost towards positive support.
avatar
Kookie
Active Member

Posts : 100
Join date : 2014-03-22
Location : in ur mom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Sir Trolled's Operater Application REDUX

Post by Sir Trolled on Tue Apr 29, 2014 10:15 pm

Kookie wrote:Well, for one, you left 22 blank. I think you skipped over it to answer it later and forgot to come back to it. Other than that, if you could maybe add a small section (or write in the comments) about how/why you've changed and you think you deserve a second chance at Operator. However, there's one thing that I'd like to point out to anyone reviewing this application. He was honest. He said "I usually keep my cool". He wasn't like the other applicants who are usually like, "I have literally never said a sentence of hatefulness to another player." If I was reviewing this application, that'd give it a pretty big boost towards positive support.

Oh, shoot, I didn't notice that. Thanks for pointing it out.
avatar
Sir Trolled
Member

Posts : 11
Join date : 2014-03-22
Age : 21
Location : your closet

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Sir Trolled's Operater Application REDUX

Post by Sir Trolled on Thu May 22, 2014 8:40 pm

can someone decide the fate of this app
avatar
Sir Trolled
Member

Posts : 11
Join date : 2014-03-22
Age : 21
Location : your closet

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Sir Trolled's Operater Application REDUX

Post by Kookie on Mon May 26, 2014 12:20 am

Bump.
avatar
Kookie
Active Member

Posts : 100
Join date : 2014-03-22
Location : in ur mom

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Sir Trolled's Operater Application REDUX

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum